Analisis faktor yang mempengaruhi pemanfaatan artificial intelligence (AI) ChatGPT pada mahasiswa di Kabupaten Garut
Kata Kunci:
ChatGPT, artificial intelligence, exploratory factor analysis, teknologi pendidikan, pembelajaran digitalAbstrak
Technological developments have transformed various aspects of human life, including learning activities in higher education. The presence of internet technology enables students to access information easily through digital devices, one of which is Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based technology such as ChatGPT. The increasing use of ChatGPT in academic environments has influenced students’ learning patterns and the utilization of digital technology in education. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the factors influencing the utilization of Artificial Intelligence (AI) ChatGPT among university students in Garut Regency. This study employed a quantitative approach using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) with SPSS software. Data were collected through questionnaires distributed to 391 respondents selected using the Slovin formula. The results showed that several factors influenced the utilization of AI ChatGPT among students, including learning independence, information quality, thinking ability, learning motivation, academic integrity, and reading interest. Among these factors, learning independence and thinking ability were identified as the dominant factors influencing the utilization of AI ChatGPT in academic activities.
Referensi
Bakkum, M. J., Hartjes, M. G., Piët, J. D., Donker, E. M., Likic, R., Sanz, E., de Ponti, F., Verdonk, P., Richir, M. C., van Agtmael, M. A., & Tichelaar, J. (2024). Using artificial intelligence to create diverse and inclusive medical case vignettes for education. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 90(3), 640–648. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.15977
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). Technology acceptance model. J Manag Sci, 35(8), 982–1003.
Facione, P. A. (2000). The disposition toward critical thinking: Its character, measurement, and relationship to critical thinking skill. Informal Logic, 20(1).
Farhi, F., Jeljeli, R., Aburezeq, I., Dweikat, F. F., Al-shami, S. A., & Slamene, R. (2023). Analyzing the students’ views, concerns, and perceived ethics about chat GPT usage. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, 100180.
Firdaus, F. N., Syofiyanti, D., Julita, R., & Fitri, R. Y. (2026). The Analisis AI ChatGPT Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa. Amorti: Jurnal Studi Islam Interdisipliner, 118–131.
Ghozali, I. (2016). Aplikasi analisis multivariete dengan program IBM SPSS 23.
Gonzales, A. L., McCrory Calarco, J., & Lynch, T. (2020). Technology problems and student achievement gaps: A validation and extension of the technology maintenance construct. Communication Research, 47(5), 750–770.
Jafari, F., & Keykha, A. (2024). Identifying the opportunities and challenges of artificial intelligence in higher education: a qualitative study. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 16(4), 1228–1245.
Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R. P., Khan, S., & Khan, I. H. (2023). Unlocking the opportunities through ChatGPT Tool towards ameliorating the education system. BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations, 3(2), 100115.
Keller, J. M. (2016). Motivation, learning, and technology: Applying the ARCS-V motivation model. Participatory Educational Research, 3(2).
Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self-directed learning (Vol. 291). association press New York.
Kvavik, R. B. (2005). Convenience, communications, and control: How students use technology. Educating the Net Generation, 1(2005), 1–7.
McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L. K. (1993). Academic dishonesty: Honor codes and other contextual influences. The Journal of Higher Education, 64(5), 522–538.
Mondragon-Estrada, E., Kirschning, I., Nolazco-Flores, J. A., & Camacho-Zuñiga, C. (2023). Fostering digital transformation in education: technology enhanced learning from professors’ experiences in emergency remote teaching. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1250461.
Murray, M. C., Pérez, J., Geist, D., & Hedrick, A. (2012). Student interaction with online course content: Build it and they might come. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 11(1), 125–140.
Nguyen, H., Nguyen, V., Ludovise, S., & Santagata, R. (2024). Misrepresentation or inclusion: promises of generative artificial intelligence in climate change education. Learning, Media and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2024.2435834
Prajapati, J. B., Kumar, A., Singh, S., Prajapati, B., Thakar, Y., Tambe, P. R., & Ved, A. (2024). Artificial intelligence-assisted generative pretrained transformers for applications of ChatGPT in higher education among graduates. SN Social Sciences, 4(2), 19.
Rahmah, S., & Ramli, M. (2025). Pemanfaatan ChatGPT Dalam Mendukung Kinerja Akademik Mahasiswa. Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi, 2(6), 479–493.
Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. In Handbook of market research (pp. 587–632). Springer.
Siroj, Y. (2022). Analisis multivariat.
Sitorus, M., & Murti, M. D. F. (2024). Analisis pengaruh penggunaan artificial intelligence pada pembelajaran di cyber university. Innotech: Jurnal Ilmu Komputer, Sistem Informasi Dan Teknologi Informasi, 1(2), 90–101.
Sugiono, S. (2024). Proses adopsi teknologi generative artificial intelligence dalam dunia pendidikan: Perspektif teori difusi inovasi. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 9(1), 110–133.
Sugiyono, S. (2011). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Tarigan, H. G. (1987). Membaca: sebagai suatu keterampilan berbahasa. (No Title).
Thohir, M., Reditiya, V. E., & Sari, N. I. P. (2023). Refleksi mahasiswa dalam berkeadaban digital melalui ChatGPT. Intelektual: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Studi Keislaman, 13(2), 109–128.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2022). Everybody’s classroom: differentiating for the shared and unique needs of diverse students. Teachers College Press.
Wang, R. Y., & Strong, D. M. (1996). Beyond accuracy: What data quality means to data consumers. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(4), 5–33.
Yahya, R. N., Azizah, S. N., & Herlambang, Y. T. (2024). Pemanfaatan ChatGPT di kalangan mahasiswa: Sebuah tinjauan etika teknologi dalam perspektif filsafat. UPGRADE: Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Informasi, 1(2), 53–59.
Yenduri, G., Ramalingam, M., Selvi, G. C., Supriya, Y., Srivastava, G., Maddikunta, P. K. R., Raj, G. D., Jhaveri, R. H., Prabadevi, B., & Wang, W. (2024). GPT (generative pre-trained transformer)—a comprehensive review on enabling technologies, potential applications, emerging challenges, and future directions. IEEE Access, 12, 54608–54649.
Yuan, Y., Li, H., & Sawaengdist, A. (2024). The impact of ChatGPT on learners in English academic writing: Opportunities and challenges in education. Language Learning in Higher Education, 14(1), 41–56.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2026 Agus Sudrajat
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Penulis yang menerbitkan artikel di Jurnal Pembelajaran Adaptif dan Teknologi (JPAT) mempertahankan sepenuhnya hak cipta atas artikelnya tanpa pembatasan, dan memberikan kepada JPAT hak penerbitan pertama. Artikel diterbitkan di bawah lisensi Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0), yang membolehkan pihak lain menyalin, menyebarluaskan, mengubah, dan mengembangkan artikel untuk keperluan apa pun, dengan syarat mencantumkan nama penulis dan sumber terbitan aslinya serta membagikan karya turunan di bawah lisensi yang sama. Penulis diperkenankan menyimpan dan menyebarluaskan versi pracetak, versi naskah diterima, maupun versi terbit artikelnya di repositori institusi, laman pribadi, atau jejaring akademik lain tanpa masa embargo, dengan menyertakan tautan ke versi resmi di laman JPAT.
